<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Battery life better with Windows 7 vs Windows XP</title> <atom:link href="http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/</link> <description>Netbook Reviews, News and Deals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:36:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Windows 7: 7 mitos</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-793</link> <dc:creator>Windows 7: 7 mitos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-793</guid> <description>[...] según algunos expertos. Muchos expresan que Windows XP es mejor que Windows 7 en esto, otros aseguran que Windows 7 si rinde mucho [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] según algunos expertos. Muchos expresan que Windows XP es mejor que Windows 7 en esto, otros aseguran que Windows 7 si rinde mucho [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kryboss</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link> <dc:creator>Kryboss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:11:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-732</guid> <description>The old version of Eee PC 1008HA has an Atom N270 processor while the new version comes with an Atom N280 which is more energy efficient.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old version of Eee PC 1008HA has an Atom N270 processor while the new version comes with an Atom N280 which is more energy efficient.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:38:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-707</guid> <description>Hey Netbook Reviews,I just replied in the comments on his post. I am going to redo the test once I have a retail copy of Windows 7 in my hands to install on my second hard drive partition.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Netbook Reviews,</p><p>I just replied in the comments on his post. I am going to redo the test once I have a retail copy of Windows 7 in my hands to install on my second hard drive partition.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: netbook reviews</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link> <dc:creator>netbook reviews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:53:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-706</guid> <description>it looks like Brad from Lilliputing thinks that the test is flawed. Just read this write-up that says Windows 7 is not better for battery life.http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks like Brad from Lilliputing thinks that the test is flawed. Just read this write-up that says Windows 7 is not better for battery life.</p><p><a
href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Se7en</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link> <dc:creator>Se7en</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:09:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-687</guid> <description>&quot; But you can only twist the facts so much. Fact is, Windows 7 is better. End of story.&quot;Wow. The whole point of Netbook News testing this stuff is to find the facts. You seem to have made up YOUR mind already. Maybe let Chris find out for himself, rather than try to dismiss his efforts? Sounds like someone is really defensive of Windows 7. Its an odd response.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; But you can only twist the facts so much. Fact is, Windows 7 is better. End of story.&#8221;</p><p>Wow. The whole point of Netbook News testing this stuff is to find the facts. You seem to have made up YOUR mind already. Maybe let Chris find out for himself, rather than try to dismiss his efforts? Sounds like someone is really defensive of Windows 7. Its an odd response.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Smidgen PC</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link> <dc:creator>Smidgen PC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:41:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-681</guid> <description>You can kick and scream about the test all you want. The fact is that Anandtech, a large hardware website which has a huge amount of resources for this kind of thing, has already done the tests and confirmed that Windows 7 smears Windows XP when it comes to battery life. Actually, Vista is battery life as well - shame it was always too much of a hog to run on netbooks.For some reason, people are really defensive of Windows XP. It is an odd response. But you can only twist the facts so much. Fact is, Windows 7 is better. End of story.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can kick and scream about the test all you want. The fact is that Anandtech, a large hardware website which has a huge amount of resources for this kind of thing, has already done the tests and confirmed that Windows 7 smears Windows XP when it comes to battery life. Actually, Vista is battery life as well &#8211; shame it was always too much of a hog to run on netbooks.</p><p>For some reason, people are really defensive of Windows XP. It is an odd response. But you can only twist the facts so much. Fact is, Windows 7 is better. End of story.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:21:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-677</guid> <description>Great, installing Windows 7 on another partition of the same machine where you already have XP would be the fairest test.Thanks for doing this, it would be helpful to a lot of people that could potential buy a Windows 7 upgrade instead of buying a new machine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, installing Windows 7 on another partition of the same machine where you already have XP would be the fairest test.</p><p>Thanks for doing this, it would be helpful to a lot of people that could potential buy a Windows 7 upgrade instead of buying a new machine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:47:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-676</guid> <description>Mark,You&#039;re right. Technically they aren&#039;t the same battery even though they are the exact same specs but because physically they are two different batteries. My point was that they are the same battery and I had hardly used my Win XP powered Asus Eee PC 1008HA so the results should not be that skewed. (operative word being skewed in that last sentence).To comment on your ways to test - I have a friend that works at Microsoft and he&#039;s going to be getting me a retail copy of Windows 7 and I&#039;ll install it on the other partition of my Windows XP powered netbook and redo the test so that it&#039;s done on the exact SAME netbook.I will update the post with future results when I have them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p><p>You&#8217;re right. Technically they aren&#8217;t the same battery even though they are the exact same specs but because physically they are two different batteries. My point was that they are the same battery and I had hardly used my Win XP powered Asus Eee PC 1008HA so the results should not be that skewed. (operative word being skewed in that last sentence).</p><p>To comment on your ways to test &#8211; I have a friend that works at Microsoft and he&#8217;s going to be getting me a retail copy of Windows 7 and I&#8217;ll install it on the other partition of my Windows XP powered netbook and redo the test so that it&#8217;s done on the exact SAME netbook.</p><p>I will update the post with future results when I have them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark (K0LO)</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link> <dc:creator>Mark (K0LO)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:07:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-675</guid> <description>Chris:I don&#039;t think you&#039;re hearing what everyone is telling you. Your test is invalid because you used two different batteries to do the test. Even though you THINK the batteries should be the same; they may not be. And insiting that they SHOULD be the same will only give people ammunition to question your results.A fundamental principle of comparison tests is that you should only change ONE variable to be sure that you draw the right conclusions. Here are suggested ways to test, from best to worst:1. Install XP and Win 7 to the same netbook with the same battery and the same power management settings on each OS.
2. Install XP and Win 7 to two identical netbooks but use the same battery for each of the tests.
3. The way you conducted the test.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:</p><p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re hearing what everyone is telling you. Your test is invalid because you used two different batteries to do the test. Even though you THINK the batteries should be the same; they may not be. And insiting that they SHOULD be the same will only give people ammunition to question your results.</p><p>A fundamental principle of comparison tests is that you should only change ONE variable to be sure that you draw the right conclusions. Here are suggested ways to test, from best to worst:</p><p>1. Install XP and Win 7 to the same netbook with the same battery and the same power management settings on each OS.<br
/> 2. Install XP and Win 7 to two identical netbooks but use the same battery for each of the tests.<br
/> 3. The way you conducted the test.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.netbookreviews.com/battery-life-better-with-windows-7-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:25:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.netbookreviews.com/?p=1496#comment-673</guid> <description>The best way to look at the test is that it appears Windows 7 will provide a better battery life than a Windows XP powered netbook. As I mentioned in an earlier comment I hardly used my Win XP powered 1008HA other than for a few video reviews.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way to look at the test is that it appears Windows 7 will provide a better battery life than a Windows XP powered netbook. As I mentioned in an earlier comment I hardly used my Win XP powered 1008HA other than for a few video reviews.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk

Served from: 74.86.6.54-static.reverse.softlayer.com @ 2010-03-14 11:10:23 -->